The drooling, Obama sycophants in the main-stream media(and bizarrely some of the conservative ones too) are calling Bobby Jindal's republican response on Tuesday night a lack-luster performance because he lacked the charisma and style of Obama. They are completely ignoring the substance of what he said, which was spot-on conservatism. By contrast, Obama said nothing of substance, just big plans to spend the country into depression by paying back political favors. Just because Obama says it and Chris Matthews gets and erection, doesn't make it substantive or a good idea.
Is this the standard now by which we judge our politicians? Their smooth, seductive delivery? Obama is long on salesmanship and pathetically short on substance. He is nothing but an inexperienced empty suit filled with nothing but flowery rhetoric packaged in a slick presentation....oh, I forgot, throw in boundless, liberal's lust to control everybodys' lives. He's got plenty of that too.
Behold, the face of 90% of the MSM.