Thanks to Bill Clinton and Maddy Albright, the extortion scheme of the Norks has paid off rather handsomely...BEIJING - North Korea will provide a complete list of its nuclear programs and disable its facilities at its main reactor complex by Dec. 31, actions that will be overseen by a U.S.-led team, the six nations involved in disarmament talks said Wednesday.
Under a broad agreement reached in February, North Korea pledged to disable its nuclear programs in return for 1 million tons of heavy fuel oil or other assistance.
In addition, the statement reiterated the five other countries' commitment to deliver the fuel oil and other energy and economic assistance as spelled out in the February deal.
But for the Clinton's allowing the sale of nuclear technology to the Norks in exchange for bags of campaign cash, we wouldn't be in the position of caving in to the threats of lunatic dictator Kim Jong Il. Madeliene Albright basically went over there and in political terms, slept with the boy-dictator, fawning all over him like Ted Kennedy over a bottle of single malt Scotch. Now we have to give them whatever they want to keep them from becoming the next nuclear capable country.
Thanks a lot Bill.
23 comments:
How do we win in this situation? They bullied us into our lunch money. We have the power necessary to take them, we are just too much of a wuss to stand up to them. Any time they are unhappy, we just give them our lunch money. Ridiculous.
What crime did Kim commit?
Please educate me on this. NoKo gave Clinton a few million dollars to help in his election. In return they received some nuclear technology. Now the US is giving them that money back, plus interest, to get them to stop this program. Maybe we should have funded the socialized medicine plan Clinton proposed years ago. It might have been cheaper, and a less bitter pill to swallow.
Those eight years have been the source of just about every problem the U.S. faces right now. Clinton had a chance to take out Saddam Hussein, and Osama bin Laden. Couple that with this and Clinton did absolutely nothing to help the U.S. homeland security. There was a Roman Emperor named Fabius Maximus. His nickname was the Cunctator because he delayed striking his opponents until it was too late. I think a comparison between him and Clinton is appropriate.
@capt. America,
Kim Jong Il is nuttier than squirrel s@#t. He's a pathologically psycho dictator with the possibility of, and ambition toward, acquiring nukes. Do you need more info than that to know this is a guy who needs to be stopped?
No doubt he's a total looney. My question was what crime he commited?
He hasn't committed a crime yet, otherwise we would be blasting him to bits right now.
Thanks Kevin.
So it can't be right to say "crime actually does pay if Clinton is involved" then.
PS: How long into the future do you think those eight Clinton years will be the source of just about every problem in US? And what about problems 3-4 years from now - will Bill be the source of them too, or will the present republican reign be to blame?
No, 3-4 years from now Hillary will be the problem, and every problem we will have will stem from problems Bill started. Look buddy, I'm in college, I argue alot, you aren't going to win this argument.
@capt. America 2:03,
No doubt he's a total looney. My question was what crime he commited?
The Bush doctrine states that pre-emption is the best offense when it comes to rogue States who threaten regional peace and world order. You don't give a guy like Kim Jong Il or Ahmadinnerjacket a chance to kill you. After that, what's the point? You kill them first.
Believe me; that you're in college, I figured out a long time ago.
@capt. America2:42,
The Clinton's aren't to blame for everything wrong in the world, but they are to blame for this. But for the Clinton's raving lust for money, the Norks would be much further from developing nukes than they are now.
What exactly do you mean by that Capt. America? do you wish to suggest that I am not as intelligent as you, or do I not make very valid points?
Not getting in the middle of your argument with Captain America, but validity is not on a sliding scale. Your point will either be valid or not; much like being pregnant, one either is or isn't -no in-between.
Ok, sorry, ill rephrase the question. Am I not very intelligent, or are my points just not valid?
Happy Skippy?
Seems like my attempt to help you got under your skin, Kevin. I was happy before, during, and after your grammar faux pas. Maybe you need to spend more time in your classes learning, and less time blogging. I'll bet the guy that's footing your bills would appreciate that. Regardless, rant on.
Give me a break, Kevin - I'm not questioning your IQ. You, of all people, should also know intelligence has nothing to do with age.
I'll just answer with this Mark Twain quote:
"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be twenty-one, I was astonished at how much he had learned."
Then why say that you figured out I was in college a long time ago? I cant help but take that in a rude way. And about saying I was in college, it was just a playful way of saying I'm way to argumentative and that you weren't going to get the better side of me. I wasn't saying that you weren't as smart as I. Sorry if that was a misunderstanding.
No need to be sorry - I didn't picture you as the father in the quote, Kevin
Haha thanks
;-)
Nice to see everybody's kissed and made up.
Willingness to understand instead of being confrontational does wonders sometimes.
Post a Comment