“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”
Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas
I'm getting tired of posting these stories, but they are happening with alarming regularity and the media are ignoring them for reasons we all know. Somebody has to get the word out. This is from CBSlocal in Philadelphia.
[my account] A white dude was minding his own business riding his bicycle when out of the blue a gang of "youths" (PC code for black youths) stepped out and punched him in the head with brass knuckles causing three skull fractures and severe flesh lacerations. Not once in the article was the ethnicity of the youths mentioned and we all know why.
When a white cop rightfully confronts a black man who's breaking into a house, later found to be his own, who then acts belligerently toward the cops, Obama calls the cop stupid and hosts a beer summit on race relations. But when dozens of instances of black flash mobs loot stores and beat the crap out of hundreds of white people, for no reason but that they are white, Obama ignores it and takes another vacation. You democrats call that leadership?
Can somebody explain the sudden explosion of what is apparently racially motivated black on white mob crimes around the country? This happened at the Wisconsin state fair where "hundreds" of black youths attacked only white people leaving the fair. This is how one witness described it....
From Todaystmj4 -- "I had a black couple on my right side, and these black kids were running in between all the cars, and they were pounding on my doors and trying to open up doors on my car, and they didn't do one thing to this black couple that was in this car next to us. They just kept walking right past their car. They were looking in every body's windshield as they were running by, seeing who was white and who was black."
My question is why don't the media, police, politicians, or race hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton say that this is black on white crime? It's racism straight up, yet they won't say it because it defeats their politically convenient view that all blacks are righteous victims and all whites are minority-hating devils.
This is a perfect use for the second amendment. I'll be damned if I'll let anybody drag my family out of our car and beat us because we're white. Some body's getting shot.
Over at Redstate, I found the embed code for this montage of Chris Matthews contradicting himself in the span of 10 minutes, just so he can label as racists, anybody who questions Obama's grade-worthiness to attend Harvard....
It's OK to question Bush's grade-worthiness but you're a racist to question Obama's? These unhinged media types like Matthews have become parodies of themselves and they don't even know it.
The "post-racial" President and his racist attorney general, Eric Holder, forced the Dayton, Ohio police department to lower their testing standards for hiring new policemen. It seems not enough blacks passed the tests so the results were thrown out.
From DaytonDailyNews -- The original passing scores determined by Civil Service required candidates to answer 57 of 86 (66 percent) questions correctly on one portion and 73 of 102 (72 percent) on the other. The lowered benchmark requires candidates to answer 50 of 86 (58 percent) questions correctly and 64 of 102 (63 percent) of questions on the other.
Absurdly, the new standard for passing is actually failing. To its credit, the Dayton chapter of the NAACP came out against the lowering of standards just to fill a perceived racial quota, determined by the Obama justice department. Even they see how wrong that practice is. Remember this is the same justice department whose policy it is NOT to pursue race-based complaints if the defendants are black. There is a pattern in this administration of preferential treatment for minorities, which undermines the concept of fairness and equal protection under the law....concepts that are guaranteed by the Constitution.
Ironically Obama, the "post-racial uniter" as the media sold him to us, has done more to contribute to disunity among the races than any one else I can think of.
Liberal toads like Chris Matthews love to invite black RINO's like Colin Powell and Michael Steele on their shows because they let him get away with using the racism charge against the GOP every time. It's embarrassing. Here's Matthews to Michael Steele.....
From Newsbusters -- "I go to Republican convention; I go to Democrat [convention] and as a white guy one of the things I notice about the difference – one thing I notice about black people at different conventions [is] you go to the Democrat convention [and] black folk are hanging together, having a good time. They’re smiling and enjoying themselves. They feel very much at home. You go to Republican [convention] – you get the feeling you are all told individually ‘now don’t bunch up; don’t get together, don’t crowd or you’ll scare these people’. Is that true in the Republican Party? Is that still true in your party?
Did you fear that if you got together with some other African Americans that white guys might get scared of you?"
By not calling him on that lie right on the spot, Steele basically confirmed the demcrats' favorite meme regarding the GOP...that they are racist bigots who are afraid of blacks in groups of more than three.
Also, did you notice how Matthews said, "Is that still true in your party?" He had to couch the question in the framework of the historical racism of the GOP. Why didn't Steele point out that it's always been the republican party that fought for equality and civil rights and the democrat party that resisted it? Why didn't he point out that democrat party policies have kept blacks dependent, poor, and uneducated and that republican policies would free minorities to achieve and succeed, limited only by their own selves? Michael Steel, like Colin Powell, wants desperately to be liked by the DC media so they let the racism charge slide.
I am ashamed of Steele for not standing up to that and I'm glad that he's no longer the RNC chair for that reason. He let Chris Matthews use him like a stooge on national TV. When he and Colin Powell get together at the next DC cocktail party, I wonder if their white hosts will get nervous?
Here's race hustler extraordinaire Al Sharpton blaming the violence, thuggery, drug addiction, and dereliction of today's black youths on the one white criminal he could think of, Scarface....
Point 1: Not one of those white reporters or other panelists had the guts to point out to Sharpton that it's black culture in general and entertainers who're setting the bad examples for black youths. I'll bet there isn't 1 black kid in 100 under the age of 25 who can tell you anything about the movie Scarface.
Point 2: Arizona has been celebrating MLK Day since 1992, yet not one panelist of the crowd of whites pointed this out. Where does Deutcsh get off suggesting that Arizona secede from the union? Because of the MLK Day that got resolved 18 years ago? Because they allow conceal/carry weapons? Because they oppose illegal immigration? Arizona should be celebrated for these things. What a tool Deutcsh is!
Every MLK Day all media people are obliged to nod stupidly and obediently agree lest they be called racists, while self-appointed black leaders spout off whatever they like about how white America is still keeping blacks down. At what point are these black leaders going to point the finger of blame at their own culture for encouraging government dependency, illiteracy with Ebonics, and always blaming others for their own failures? At what point is Al Sharpton going to admit that blacks are disproportionately responsible for violent crimes against other blacks, responsible for their kids' obsession with drugs, violence, and lawlessness through rap music, and responsible for the illegitimacy rate for blacks being around 70%?
Besides conservative black columnists, the only two blacks brave enough to speak up are Bill Cosby and Juan Williams, yet they are dismissed as Uncle Toms for daring to tell blacks that it's their own fault for failing. It's much easier for blacks, and less uncomfortable for guilty whites, to let a hustler like Sharpton repeat ad-nauseum the blacks-are-victims-of-opressive-white-patriarchal-society canard. It fits the race template everybody's comfortable with.
New York's most famous fish-wrapper wasted no time in mocking the reading of the Constitution aloud on the House floor by republicans, now in the majority..... "In any case, it is a presumptuous and self-righteous act, suggesting that they alone understand the true meaning of a text that the founders wisely left open to generations of reinterpretation. Certainly the Republican leadership is not trying to suggest that African-Americans still be counted as three-fifths of a person."
I've heard this red-herring argument many times before and I'll bet that every single person who's ever used it thinks that each black person was actually counted as 3/5ths of a person during pre-Civil War census taking. Well, here's the truth.....
In the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, the northern(anti-slave) states struck a compromise with the southern(pro-slave) states regarding the census. Northern states didn't want any slaves counted and southern states wanted all slaves counted. It was called not surprisingly the "Three Fifths Compromise". It was designed to reduce the congressional representation of slave states and increase the relative representation of northern states by counting all the non-free people in the slave states and then multiplying that total number by 3/5ths.
It was not, as race hustlers, craven democrat politicians, and NYT op/ed writers like to tell you, that the Constitution viewed each black slave as 3/5ths of a person. It was about enumeration and nothing else.
That the NYT would trot out this tired, false argument shows what despicable excuses for journalists are employed there, why nobody reads it any more, and fully explains why the stock price is below junk status. What a rag! I wouldn't line a litter box with the NYTimes.
NY state senator Eric Adams(left) was whining about the New York fish wrappers calling for himself and John Sampson(right) to be thrown out of office....
From NYDailyNews -- “When you look at the press, when you look at The Times and look at The Daily News, they’re talking about ‘throw the bums out’ and the dysfunction in Albany because we’re not functioning the way they used to do business. This is about removing men of color from power. And that’s not going to happen."
Too often, black politicians, who've gotten used to the trappings of power to the point that their constituents no longer have confidence in their representation, resort to the racism charge against their critics regardless of the merits or substance of the criticism. This won't win them any votes. No voter appreciates being labelled a racist just for disagreeing with a black politician. Moreover, it dilutes the charge of racism when there actually is some racism to be exposed. Nobody believes it exists as often as these guys claim, because it doesn't. Black politicians only do themselves and other black politicians a disservice by throwing the racism around so cavalierly.
CNN's Rick Sanchez reminds everybody why he's the dumbest anchor on all of TV and makes his boss reconsider that network's "hire-the-handicapped" program....
He was exclaiming to guest Jessica Yellin regarding Obama's recent denial that he didn't have a US birth-certificate by saying, "...he's the cotton-picking President of the United States!"
I get that it's just an expression of frustration and not intended to be racial but CNN's race-conscious viewers reminded him via Twitter that you can't call the first black president "cotton-picking" anything, forcing the duly chastised Sanchez to offer an apology. Heh heh....imagine if a Fox anchor had called the black President the "cotton-picking President". There'd be blood in the streets over that firing. But the retards at CNN can get away with it because they are the propaganda wing of the democrat party.
Apparently the Iowa police are having trouble deciding whether a beating of a white guy by a group of 30 blacks yelling, "beat whitey night", was racially motivated. Let's give them a hand.....
From thesmokinggun -- Police are investigating whether a series of assaults at the Iowa State Fair were racially motivated since the attackers reportedly announced it was “Beat Whitey Night” during one attack.
According to a Des Moines Police Department report, a group of young black assailants pummeled a white fairgoer Friday night, an assault that cops believe may have racial overtones due to what was said by the attackers.
There has been scant little news coverage of this outrage in the hypocritical, mainstream media. Probably because in their eyes, blacks cannot be racists, and exposing them as racists defeats the media objective of perpetuating the template of white guilt and blacks always as victims of an unfair, white, patriarchal society.
I shudder to think of the media firestorm had this been a group of whites beating a black kid.
Like everybody on Earth couldn't have predicted this eventuality.....
(CBS/AP) Ousted Agriculture Department employee Shirley Sherrod says she will sue a conservative blogger who posted an edited video of her making racially tinged remarks last week.
Sherrod made the announcement Thursday in San Diego at the National Association of Black Journalists annual convention.
Of course she's suing. It's what she and her husband do. It's what all put-upon Americans do who imagine they've been wronged by somebody who's got a little money that they want for themselves. The party she should be suing however, is the Obama administration for firing her without just cause. They demanded her resignation before anybody ever watched the video. But that won't happen because she's black and she said she loves him because he's the first black President.
From what I've read Andrew Breitbart is on pretty solid footing in terms of charges of slander and/libel, so I doubt this law-suit is going anywhere. There's no way Breitbart will settle either.
Thursday, July 08, 2010
Here's the charming guy Obama's justice department specifically chose not to prosecute for voter intimidation in Philadelphia on '08....
This is the clearest case of voter intimidation in memory, yet Obama directed stooge Eric Holder not to pursue the case. According to a justice department lawyer who resigned his position in protest, it was because of Obama's outrageous policy of never prosecuting blacks to the benefit of whites. How's that for the post-racial candidate?
"I hate every iota of a cracker." That's gold Jerry, gold!
I'm wondering what a country without us crackers and our babies would be like. A miserable, despotic hell-hole like Zimbabwe or the Ivory Coast perhaps?
Linda Sanchez is overplaying the race card....just a little.....
A California congresswoman is pointing the finger at white supremacist groups, who she says have inspired Arizona's new law cracking down on illegal immigrants.
Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Calif., told a Democratic Club on Tuesday that white supremacist groups are influencing lawmakers to adopt laws that will lead to discrimination.
"There's a concerted effort behind promoting these kinds of laws on a state-by-state basis by people who have ties to white supremacy groups," said the lawmaker, who is of Mexican descent. "It's been documented. It's not mainstream politics."
Rep. Sanchez accusing supporters of the Arizona immigration law of being in league with white supremacists is as stupid as democrats accusing conservatives of being Nazis. Because of that, it also qualifies as a validation of Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies which states that any person who uses as a debate point, the accusation of his adversary as being like a Nazi, automatically loses the argument because it's such a stupid point. Democrats who have no reasonable argument to make always resort to the racism charge because they know the media will dutifully parrot the charge and dumb democrat voters will stupidly believe it.
The century flood that made a disaster area out of Nashville has an estimated damage cost of over a billion dollars and killed 19 people so far, yet had scant little coverage from the main stream media. Why is that?
I hate to be the one to point it out but, maybe it's because there are no minorities standing on top of their rental houses whining about the government response. Maybe it's because Tennesseans are taking care of each other and themselves and don't want the government swooping in the "help". Maybe it's because Nashville isn't full of indigent, welfare sponges that fit the media's narrative of "poor-people-get-unfairly-victimized-by-weather" on which they are so fond of reporting.
When self-sufficient, responsible Americans are struck by tragedy, it's not story to the media. Plus, if they made too much of a big deal about it, they might find themselves having to blame Obama the way they blamed Bush for Katrina....and they don't dare question The One.
Over at his site, Andrew Breitbart is calling for all the members of the Congressional black caucus, who lied about being called the N-word by tea-party activists during their idiotic march with Nancy Pelosi to vote on Obamacare, to apologize for bleating about racism when there isn't a shred of evidence of any. Jesse Jackson's half-witted son (pictured above filming the whole stupid stunt) has yet to produce any evidence of white racism.
Rep. Andre Carson claimed that he and other black congress-critters were yelled at by white protesters and called the N-word 15 times yet, even after a reward of $100,000 promised by Breitbart to be donated to the NAACP, not one audio or video clip has been produced. In this day and age of video-cell phones, iPod recorders, and TV cameras not a single second of audio or video footage has been produced to show anybody calling any congressperson the N-word.
Andre Carson and the other members of the congressional black caucus should be ashamed of themselves for being degenerate liars. They cry racism whenever it suits their political needs and then preposterously accuse anyone who asks for evidence of said racism, of being a racist.
As the democrats head toward the buzz-saw that awaits them at the polls in November, President Zero offered this rallying call for his core constituency to return to the polls to help the doomed democrats out. Among other things, he called for.......
"young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women who powered our victory in 2008 [to] stand together once again." I guess that's a fair description of typical, democrat voter blocks....people who pay scant few taxes if any, and women who either vote with their emotions or are aroused by the suave sophistication of The One. How ever you look at it, America is half full of some of the stupidest voters anywhere.
Exit question: Why is it OK to rally voters by appealing to their sense of race solidarity, that is unless their race is Caucasian? Then you're a racist.
In what is probably the most telling clip of the week, half witted NBC skirt, Kelly O'Donnel, attempts to convince a black man that he should be concerned about being around so many white people at a tea party.....
The main stream media cannot stand it that there is no evidence anywhere, of racism, violence, or even littering among tea-party activists. Their template is that we don't like Obama because of his race. It never occurs to them that we don't like Obama because of his policies. As SisterToldjah observed, shouldn't black people feel uncomfortable on all-white MSNBC too?
You know it's time for a change at the RNC when our guy plays the race card.....
Embattled Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said he won't resign despite calls for him to step down amid reports of the group's excessive spending, adding that he and other African-American leaders such as President Obama have a slimmer margin of error because of their race.
Claiming that you are held to an unfair standard because of your skin color, as an excuse for bad behavior, is grounds for immediate replacement in the RNC leadership as far as I'm concerned. It's no different that Obama's defenders accusing tea party activists of racism because we disagree with his political policies. The last thing conservatives need is a black leader whining about institutional and societal racism in order to cover up his mistakes and corruption.
New York Times Pays Execs Extra To Hire Minorities And Women Instead Of White Guys
Apparently the NYT is concerned about the whiteness of it's staff so to encourage the hiring of more minorities, the senior execs can earn as much as a 10% bonus. As it turns out, since the inception of the hiring incentives, only one guy as earned any extra mullah, and he earned 5%. Turns out the chief regurgitator of liberal talking points, isn't as diverse as they accuse the rest of America of not being.
Exit question: how do the hired minorities respond when asked how they feel about their bosses being bribed to hire them for no reason but the color of their skin? Would you want to be hired for your meaningless ethnic background or your ability to do the job for which you were competing?
It's official now in Obama's America, if a minority gets offended by it, you can be thrown in jail for simple speech....
A man has been arrested for allegedly announcing a hateful message over a South Jersey Wal-Mart's intercom, police told NBC Philadelphia.
Several shoppers have been boycotting the retailer since last Sunday when a man accessed the Washington Township, N.J. store's public address system and announced: "Attention Wal-Mart customers: All black people leave the store now."
The whole idea of "hate crimes" is absurd. It criminalizes thoughts. Since when is unpleasant speech a criminal act in America? More preposterous still, is that the police and media are calling black people who heard the announcement, "victims" of the hate crime. In what law is there a guarantee to not be offended by anything without it being a crime?
I wonder if somebody had announced, "all honkies leave the store now", would there be this outcry and phony outrage? I seriously doubt it.
