“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”

Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas

Friday, May 24, 2013

Muslim immigrants will always hate their native hosts

The "multiculturalists" in Sweden rioted again for the fifth night, with no end in sight. Native Swedes are perplexed, believing their egalitarian system of transferring massive wealth from the productive to the lazy, non-productive to achieve equality is a good system. It is not.

Turns out that the immigrants, mostly from Muslim north Africa, refuse to assimilate into Swedish culture or society, fail out of school, and refuse employment, preferring instead to sit on their parasitical asses with their hands out for the generous helpings of other peoples' money.

Sociologists and criminologists blame the increasing income disparity between native Swedes and increasingly marginalized immigrants, but that's what happens when you have a productive native population and a lazy, good-for-nothing immigrant population that is hostile to native customs on religious grounds.

No, Muslim immigrants will riot and cause trouble no matter how much kindness you show them or how much money you give them for free. They will always hate infidels and plot our destruction even as they accept our bribe money not to.


Isaac A. Nussbaum said...

The following is a quote suggesting that, where MOOSLEMS are concerned, Ed is either misinformed or bought and sold, one or the other:


And not just a few, but as of this moment, as many as 12 million.

Now, how do we reconcile this fact with what the mainstream media [plus Ed –IAN] tell us on a daily basis, that DEM MOOSLEMS want to kill Christians, convert them by the sword, cut their heads off and circumcise their women?

~Michael Rivero

Ed said...

Isaac, Muslims tolerate Christians as dhimmis, at best. Where Christians have a significant presence in mostly Muslim countries, Sharia isn't the dominant culture.....yet.

Take Egypt for example, Hosni Mubarak was a dictator by anybody's measure, but he was fairly secular, as is Assad in Syria, Qaddafi in Libya, and Saddam Hussein in Iraq. They didn't tolerate Islamic extremism in their countries and Christians were allowed to exist.

Fast forward to today, and in the absence of a strong, secular dictator, all of those countries are experiencing Islamism as the rule of the land, and Christians are fleeing in droves.

Care to explain that Isaac?

Isaac A. Nussbaum said...

"...in the absence of a strong, secular dictator...."

The U.S., overtly and covertly, has helped precipitate a struggle for power in country after country. The resulting strife has made refugees of Muslims and Christians alike...just as it does for indigenous nationals in all places, at all times. We should be ashamed of ourselves.

Ed said...

Perhaps so, but you are making two different arguments. The US meddling in the affairs of other countries is a debatable point on which we probably agree for the most part.

The other is what happens when a secular dictator who controls his Islamic country is rudely displaced by the Americans and a power vacuum is left?

You get a worse situation than before. This is Obama's "Arab Spring" and it is an utter failure. In every country where an "arab spring" has taken place, much to the delight of the media and deranged liberals like Obama and McCain, anti-American Islamism is now the order of the day and it will come back to haunt us.

Isaac A. Nussbaum said...

I can't quarrel with a word of that, Ed.