These hate-America, Hollywood types crack me up with their self-important pronouncements...telling American men we are too masculine to get along in the modern world...and I suppose France's femininity has worked well for them over the years...
Ethan Hawke blasts BushBy Indo Asian News ServiceLondon, July 8 (IANS) Actor Ethan Hawke has criticised US President George W. Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq and feels American men should re-think the concept of masculinity.
'Masculine identity has been ruling the world for a long time. You could make a case that it was needed at one time to keep people safe, build buildings, make roads and conquer nature. But that masculine thing has also led us to war. Men like to fight. But, because of globalisation, I think, in some fundamental way, 'Might makes right' is over.'
George Bush is making difficult decisions and taking difficult actions daily, to deal with crazed lunatics who are threatening the security of the world with WMD's and long range missiles. These actors who make their fortunes pretending to be hypermasculine heroes are ironically, really just a bunch of touchy-feely, emotion-driven, pudding heads whose toughest decision each day consists of which size double-caff latte' to order at Starbucks. Obviously you have to take a hardline with these wacko dictators...it's all they understand. Diplomacy has never worked with people who are liars and will break their end of a bargain whenever it suits them. Diplomacy, dialogue, and "understanding" has always defined the liberals' method for appeasing homocidial madmen who threaten the world. It's decisive, confrontational, big-stick action that achieves peace with violent, rogue nations like Iran and North Korea...not mommy-style coddling.
Every day I'm thankful that a man like Bush is dealing with the world's trouble-makers and not a hand-wringing, bedwetter like Ethan Hawke.
5 comments:
The world hates George W. Bush
Georg Bush is the most dangerous person in the world. Every day people die becouse of him...
are the americans blind?
Is this Cindy Sheehan using a pen name?
How many people do you think died because of Saddam? How many die because of Kim Jong Il? How many died because of Hitler?
Did mommy-coddling work with Hitler? With the Imperial Japanese? With any despotic regime in the history of the world? Tell me Liliana, how would you put a stop to the human rights atrocities, the rape rooms, the gassing of hundreds of thousands, the torture, the executions, and the financing and exportation of terrorism? How Liliana, how would you handle it? With diplomacy? With dialogue and understanding? With massive amounts of taxpayer dollars in aid?
Seriously Liliane, I want to hear from you. How would you have handled Hitler if not by force?
Liliana...seriously...George Bush- the most dangerous man in the world?? Are you kidding? Do you even know who Kim Jong Il and Saddam Hussein are? Do you know what all they have done to their own people? Did you see the footage on the news where the North Korean woman is trying to leave the country with her little girl. Her daughter was yanked from her arms, kicking and screaming, while her mother was shot and killed on the spot...right in front of her daughter. Look at how many men, women and children have been raped and murdered under Saddam's regime. Please tell me what George Bush has done that even comes close to what these vicious dictators have done in their attempt at total control. What would you have President Bush do? You, like so many others, offer criticism but no answers...what would YOU do.
The ball would appear to be in your court Liliana.
Cedric, I have long suspected that you have drunk insatiably and blindly from the Michael Moore, kool-aid vat of Liberalism, now you have provided confirmation.
You imply that Islamofascists, Jihadists, and Communists, represent little more than different but equal cultures when compared to our Democracy(actually a Representative Republic), and as such, occupy equivalent moral grounds. Any thinking person must reject this as asinine. There exists in the world, good and bad.
The fact that they are trying to annhiliate us is what separates the U.S. as the good guys and them as the bad guys. Obviously you are a believer in moral relativism(a tell-tale symptom of kool-aid dependence). I reject the bogus concept moral relativism. There are certain criteria that define human existence, one of which is moral absolutism: The acknowledgement of the existence of right and wrong and the willingness to take action to defend that which is right. Terrorism, genocide, killing civilians, ethnic cleansing, rape rooms, denial of private ownership, the subjugation of women according to Sharia law, governmental denial of individual rights of speech, press, and worship...all of these things and more are absolutely morally wrong...period, regardless of whether Islamists perceive them to be moral and right. I disagree with George Bush on many things, but as the President of a country which does not engage in any of the above moral violations and the leader of the free world, he has the moral authority to defend the U.S., and those countries unable to defend themselves, against violent aggressors.
Finally Cedric, not everything is a race issue. Screaming "racism" everytime someone poses a policy disagreement with you demeans the valid issue of racism, which ironically, is practiced most egregiously by the cultures you defend.
Post a Comment