“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”

Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas


Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Not such a great idea after all

If you are one of those insufferable, E85, global-warming zealots who thinks if we just burn green ethanol in our cars we can save Mother Earth and kick our petroleum habit all at the same time, then read this exerpt from an article in Rolling Stone...



The most seductive myth about ethanol is that it will free us from our dependence on foreign oil. But even if ethanol producers manage to hit the mandate of 36 billion gallons of ethanol by 2022, that will replace a paltry 1.5 million barrels of oil per day -- only seven percent of current oil needs. Even if the entire U.S. corn crop were used to make ethanol, the fuel would replace only twelve percent of current gasoline use.
Another misconception is that ethanol is green. In fact, corn production depends on huge amounts of fossil fuel -- not just the diesel needed to plow fields and transport crops, but also the vast quantities of natural gas used to produce fertilizers. Runoff from industrial-scale cornfields also silts up the Mississippi River and creates a vast dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico every summer. What's more, when corn ethanol is burned in vehicles, it is as dirty as conventional gasoline and does little to solve global warming: E85 reduces carbon dioxide emissions by a modest fifteen percent at best, while fueling the destruction of tropical forests.

But the biggest problem with ethanol is that it steals vast swaths of land that might be better used for growing food. In a recent article in Foreign Affairs titled "How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor," University of Minnesota economists C. Ford Runge and Benjamin Senauer point out that filling the gas tank of an SUV with pure ethanol requires more than 450 pounds of corn -- roughly enough calories to feed one person for a year.

Thanks in large part to the ethanol craze, the price of beef, poultry and pork in the United States rose more than three percent during the first five months of this year. In some parts of the country, hog farmers now find it cheaper to fatten their animals on trail mix, french fries and chocolate bars. And since America provides two-thirds of all global corn exports, the impact is being felt around the world. In Mexico, tortilla prices have jumped sixty percent, leading to food riots. In Europe, butter prices have spiked forty percent, and pork prices in China are up twenty percent. By 2025, according to Runge and Senauer, rising food prices caused by the demand for ethanol and other biofuels could cause as many as 600 million more people to go hungry worldwide.


See ethanol does far more harm than good. When hysterical morons like Al Gore start trying to cram some magic bullet down the throats of Americans in order to save the world, it always turns out badly. Government mandates for E85 are based solely on political correctness and political payback to the corn industry, that is all. It has nothing, nothing to do with global warming or energy dependence.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, when government stays out of the market and consumers make decisions with their wallets, everybody benefits.

Close to home

In sickening servitude to political correctness, the American media regularly lecture us about how the terrorists are an extreme minority within mainstream Islam, and that they have hijacked the otherwise wonderful, loving Religion of Peace. But a mainstream Imam in Great Britain had these remarks this week concerning the role of women and children in jihad...

At the UK-based Islamic discussion forum Ummah.com, they’re discussing whether it’s all right to kill children while waging jihad: [Is it] impermissible to kill women and children in all circumstances?

The verdict, according to a spiritual leader? No problem killing them.

But you can only rape the women if you capture them first and make them slaves. Then it’s OK, because it’s no longer rape at that point.


Not convinced? Here are the Imam's exact words. You can decide for yourself...

The apparent [Thahir] is that it is (permissible) for us to kill their women and children- even if it means that we lose profit/benefit from it [since keeping them alive is a profit/benefit because they become the property of the Muslims]; (and killing them in this situation is permissible) due to it threatening the hearts of the enemies and a humiliation for them.

There you have it right from the horses mouth ladies and gentlemen. While these "moderate" Muslims may not engage in terrorism against women and children themselves, they recongnize it's usefullness and allow for it's employment in world-wide jihad against infidels.

There's a Muslim sect which trying to have a "worship center" built in my neighborhood. Obviously the residents are against it. The local media will predictably take the side of the Muslims and castigate those of us in opposition as racist bigots.

The taliban are murdering South Korean peace workers in Afghanistan as I write this.

This raises the big question: Is it free practice of religion in America if the message to your church membership includes the barbaric, violent treatment of anybody, man, woman or child, who doesn't embrace Islam? In this post 9/11 age, is the Islamic radicalization of our neighbors something we as a nation want taking place in our churches? Constitutionally, what can we do to stop it?

Greed, for lack of a better word....is good

Think American ingenuity and entrepreneurship is going down the toilet? Check it out...

General Motors Corp., the largest U.S. automaker, reported an $891-million profit for the second quarter of the year, driven by strong sales in emerging global markets and reduced costs from its restructuring efforts.

On the brink of collapse, the greatest American car company pulls out a huge profit after reorganizing and sticking it to the abysmal labor union thugs....Oh man I love the brazen, shameless pursuit of profit!!!

Monday, July 30, 2007

1984 in 2007

As our country spirals downward toward the politically correct chaos known as socialism, the thought police have indoctrinated Americans to accept the absurd idea that it's possible for you to be arrested, prosecuted, and jailed for having a thought that they find unpleasing to the State. Think I'm exaggerating? Take a look at this...

NEW YORK -- A 23-year-old man was arrested Friday on hate-crime charges after he threw a Quran in a toilet at Pace University on two separate occasions.

Stanislav Shmulevich of Brooklyn, was arrested on charges of criminal mischief and aggravated harassment, both hate crimes.


That's right. Because the State decided that this guy was thinking something hostile toward a group with special protections, he's guilty of a greater crime than otherwise. He's been prosecuted for his thoughts. If you can't taste the bile in your mouth after reading that sentence, you are a bad American.

When Andres Serrano immersed a crucifix in his own urine, he was awarded tax-payer money for his "art" and praised by fishwrappers like the NYTimes. All Mr. Shmulevich did was immerse the Quran in urine. Why wasn't he given taxpayer money for his "art" and praised by the NYTimes? Could it be because, ever since 9/11, perversely, Arabs now enjoy special protected class in America? Or could it be that liberal America is just particularly hostile to Christianity? Or both?

You can pervert, defile, or otherwise desecrate the symbol of Christianity all you want and liberal democrats will love you and throw money at you to do it some more, but God help you if you think bad thoughts about the great religion of Islam.

Another example of the Bush legacy ladies and gentlemen

I know that at-risk pregnant women tug at the heart strings of normal, feeling Americans. That being said, illegal aliens who count on that compassion so they can get into America to have their babies has got to be stopped if we are going to be serious about curbing illegal immigration from Mexico. Well, Mitt Romney made some noise the other day about just that. Here's the exerpt of his speech...

"I ... don't think it makes sense to have an immigration policy that says that if an illegal couple—a couple that comes across the border illegally—has a child here, that child becomes a U.S. citizen, that then the whole family gets to come in, if you will, through 'chain migration,'" he said.

The fourteenth amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the United States, but that has become a powerful lure for illegals to sneak across the border in their ninth month of pregnancy just so they can have their baby here and receive free medical care. They know that the compassionate American government will not send them back and will even welcome the immediate family so as not to appear to be keeping families apart. After that, there are dozens of taxpayer funded programs of which they can take advantage.

"But Ed", you ignorantly argue, "illegal immigrants come here just to have a better life and they contribute their fair share to the tax box. Why shouldn't they take advantage of programs that are offered?"

It is a fact that the average illegal family consumes 3 times more in social program largesse than they contribute. If this trend continues, at some point there will be more demanded by the shiftless illegal immigrant class than is available and the whole system collapses. The automatic citizenship clause of the Constitution should be repealed. I don't have a problem with insuring that a visitor to this country, illegal or not, has a safe delivery. The baby should assume the citizenship of the parents' home country and should be sent back there at the earliest convenience. That George Bush has failed utterly and miserably to do anything about this problem makes him derelict in his duty as president in my book. Which ever republican goes on the record promising to do something, anything to stem the illegal invasion, he'll get my vote for president.

It's OK to feel sorry for them, but to shower them with fabulous cash and prizes, at tax-payer expense, because they managed to get here in time to have their baby in the Santa Fe Wal Mart parking lot is wrong-headed to say the least.

Friday, July 27, 2007

Chicks with Guns

Generally I'm a fan of chicks with guns but, I'm not sure I'd ask these girls out on a date...

Israeli fighters taking a break from killing Palestinian terrorists by having a delicious and refreshing ice-cream cone.

Shameful!

If this turns out to be true, there is no punishment harsh enough for the one who did it and the ones who covered it up...

(AP) SAN FRANCISCO Army medical examiners were suspicious about the close proximity of the three bullet holes in Pat Tillman's forehead and tried without success to get authorities to investigate whether the former NFL player's death amounted to a crime, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.

"The medical evidence did not match up with the, with the scenario as described," a doctor who examined Tillman's body after he was killed on the battlefield in Afghanistan in 2004 told investigators.

The doctors -- whose names were blacked out -- said that the bullet holes were so close together that it appeared the Army Ranger was cut down by an M-16 fired from a mere 10 yards or so away.

Ultimately, the Pentagon did conduct a criminal investigation, and asked Tillman's comrades whether he was disliked by his men and whether they had any reason to believe he was deliberately killed. The Pentagon eventually ruled that Tillman's death at the hands of his comrades was a friendly-fire accident.

The medical examiners' suspicions were outlined in 2,300 pages of testimony released to the AP this week by the Defense Department in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

Among other information contained in the documents:

-- In his last words moments before he was killed, Tillman snapped at a panicky comrade under fire to shut up and stop "sniveling."

-- Army attorneys sent each other congratulatory e-mails for keeping criminal investigators at bay as the Army conducted an internal friendly-fire investigation that resulted in administrative, or non-criminal, punishments.

-- The three-star general who kept the truth about Tillman's death from his family and the public told investigators some 70 times that he had a bad memory and couldn't recall details of his actions.

-- No evidence at all of enemy fire was found at the scene -- no one was hit by enemy fire, nor was any government equipment struck.


As a former member of the military, I can't imagine something like this taking place but I guess I'm naive and idealistic like that.

Thursday, July 26, 2007

It's Ann Coulter Thursday!

This week Ann pokes fun of the democratic "debate" on YouTube. Biting and sarcastic as always. Read it here.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Mrs. Silky Pony

Just when you thought the Silky Pony couldn't get any stupider, we hear that his wife, Elizabeth has decided to not eat any foods that aren't locally produced. You see the global hoax known as man-made global warming includes fossile-fuel combustion, which is part of transportation costs, in it's rediculous calculation of carbon footprint size. Dumb, rich liberals think that by pretending to sacrifice in their own lives, they are setting a good example for the little people to follow. As her personal sacrifice, Mrs. Breck Girl is giving up Tangerines, since they aren't grown in North Carolina.

I have an idea for the absurdly rich Edwards family...how about living in a house not the size of the SuperDome...that would be a start.

Tangerines, now on the list of things you can't have if you want to save Mother Earth.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Let's roll!!!

Everybody knows the heroic story of Todd Beamer and the guys on flight 93 on 9/11 who realized that the high-jackers were going to crash their plane into something in Washington(many believe it was the WhiteHouse or Congress). Beamer and the guys organized themselves and launched an incredibly brave attack and foiled the plot. In doing so, their plane crashed into a field in Shanksville, PA. Rightfully, a memorial should be erected there to commemorate their bravery against the savagery that marks radical Islam. Well, take a look at the picture, read the caption ,and then tell me if it is a fitting tribute to their bravery...

Green circle was obtained from the Salat Times utility at Islam.com. It shows the direction to Mecca from Somerset PA. The red arrow shows that a person standing halfway between the tips of the giant crescent and facing into the center of the crescent is facing almost exactly at Mecca. The meaning? A crescent that Muslims face into to face Mecca is called a mihrab and is the central feature around which every mosque is built. (Everything you see in this graphic remains completely intact in the superficially altered Bowl of Embrace redesign.)

If you want to take a closer, in depth look at this outrage, go here, and read about the number of lives lost according to the memorial is not the American passengers, but it's the passengers plus terrorists who are remembered fondly....absolutely unbelievable!!!