The Gore Effect strikes again

No matter which year or what location, when the UN hosts it's annual Climate Change Conference and Al Gore is an attendee, the local temperatures always set records for cold. And Cancun is no exception. For the last three days, Cancun has experienced record cold days with temperatures dipping into the low 50's. Seems kind of balmy to most people but Cancun isn't really that far from the equator. It should be much warmer.

And that's the Gore Effect. Where ever he goes to talk about imaginary global warming, it gets bizarrely cold. But I doubt Gore realizes what the temp is outside, he's in his room releasing his 7th Chakra by molesting the housekeeping staff.

Another UN-caused disaster

If you mistakenly believe that the United Nations troops are ineffective, think again. If you want to infect with deadly Cholera, a tiny island nation already ravaged by hurricanes and earthquakes, then the UN troops are exactly the men for the job.

Almost 1000 people in Haiti have died from an unexplained Cholera outbreak. "Coincidentally" 454 UN troops, fresh off an adventure raping, murdering, and pillaging Nepalese locals, moved into Haiti, bringing Cholera with them. Predictably the UN claimed it was just another isolated incident, but CDC experts say there's no reason for Cholera to exist in Haiti unless an infected person brought it. If this outbreak goes unchecked, observers estimate hundreds of thousands could eventually die.

And what do you suppose the UN is doing about this crisis that they caused? Why demanding $164million, that's what. For the UN it's always about money, more and more money....especially from the US.

How badly can the UN do it's job before the US finally stops underwriting this disaster of an organization?

Ahmadinnerjacket comes to town

Our favorite ruthless dictator, Mahmoud Ahmadinnerjacket, the laughable, Gilligan-like president of Iran, was in New York yesterday at the despicable UN to spit in Obama's eye....

From FoxNews -- He was greeted by applause when he walked into the United Nations General Assembly, and applauded again, even after questioning 9/11 and claiming that the American government may have been behind the attack.

That’s right, applauded after questioning the motivation for the terrorist attacks, who was responsible for them, and essentially suggesting they were a U.S. plot.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has made a variety of claims over the years during his appearances here, but he never has gone this far when talking about 9/11.

During his General Assembly address, the Iranian President called for a “U.N. fact finding group” to investigate 9/11.

He also said that ”the majority of the American people as well as most nations and politicians around the world” believe that “some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining of the American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order to save the Zionist regime.”

When the entire body of the United Nations applauds as our worst enemy comes to our country and spits in our faces, how can we justify continuing to underwrite this collection of America-hating despots and shiftless thugs? If anybody reading this can give me one reason to continue to host(and by host, I mean pay for at taxpayer expense) the worst organization in the world including the KKK, right here in New York. It is reprehensible to me that the most corrupt collection of self-serving dictators and criminals enjoys diplomatic immunity and is welcomed with open arms by our government.

That Obama had little to say in reply other than a school-marm lecture about peace, tolerance, and shared prosperity shows what an awful Marxist President he really is and how little regard he has for his office or the people he pretends to lead.....the American people.

Bugs, the new white meat

Despite a complete and utter lack of global-warming credibility or credibility of any kind, the United Nations, hellbent on controlling the population of rich nations, is pressing forward with it's attempt to relegate the world back to Pre-Cambrian days when we foraged for insects and worms for nutrition....

From Dailymail -- ...if the United Nations gets its way, we might all soon be adding creepy-crawlies to our weekly shopping lists. The UN is considering strategies to cut levels of meat consumption worldwide as part of its commitment to stamp out famine and cut global warming.

Nothing would make the creeps and thugs in the UN, not to mention America's liberals, happier than for us, not them, to eat bugs and worms for dinner and wash it down with our own urine. After which we'd sit huddled in the dark, shivering under gov't-issued blankets, and watch propaganda on MSNBC on the one UN-approved TV channel....all in the name of sustainability and the prevention of global warming.

If we aren't careful who we elect, we may find that segments of our sovereignty have been ceded over to the UN as a pretext for preventing some imaginary global catastrophe and there won't be anything we can do about it except smile and fork over our tax money to be distributed elsewhere.

Hillary Clinton to confess America's sins to the U.N.

The ridiculous collection of despots, thugs, and terrorist sponsors that sit on the United Nations Human Rights Council must be laughing their asses off at this one.....

CNSNews.com) – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Thursday that the State Department is soliciting comments from citizens, advocacy groups and other non-governmental organizations on the human rights record of the United States

The existence of the Obama presidency is absurd to begin with but, it gets even more ridiculous. The US will be reporting our own human-rights violations to the America-haters at the UN. What human-rights violations you might wonder? I'm guessing the following will probably be on the list:

-failure to redistribute wealth adequately
-failure to provide "living wages" to all the poor
-failure to provide high-quality health-care for free
-failure to provide tax-payer funded Internet access to the less fortunate

Feel free to add to the list in the comments thread.

The dispicable UN attempts another money grab

Never ones to let a world crisis, real or imagined, go to waste, the corrupt bureaucrats over at the UN are demanding that the US save the world....again....

From The Guardian...

The swine flu pandemic could kill millions and cause anarchy in the world's poorest nations unless £900m can be raised from rich countries to pay for vaccines and antiviral medicines, says a UN report leaked to the Observer.

"cause anarchy in the world's poorest nations"....heh, heh. There's already anarchy in the world's poorest nations. That's why they're poor. This is just another attempt by vile, corrupt UN officials to guilt the productive nations into forking over our wealth to them. If those countries would institute the rule of law, economic freedom, and representative government rather than blood-thirsty, lawless dictatorships, they could be productive members of the world community too, and maybe produce their own drugs to combat epidemics.

With Obama chairing the UN security council, however, we just might see that $1.5billion USD get handed over to the thugs and despots that created the anarchy and chaos in the third world.

Biting the hand that feeds you

As if the US needed yet another reason to withdraw entirely from the absolutely reprehensible United Nations.....

WASHINGTON (AP) - The White House objected Thursday to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's description of the United States as a "deadbeat" donor to the world body.

Ban used the phrase Wednesday during a private meeting with lawmakers at the Capitol, one day after he met with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Ban's "word choice was unfortunate," given that the U.S. is the largest contributor to the United Nations.

The United States pays 22 percent of the organization's nearly $5 billion operating budget but is perennially late paying its dues.

Asked whether Ban should retract his comment, Gibbs said some recognition by Ban of the U.S. role would be appropriate.

"I think given the contribution that the American taxpayer makes, I do think it would be appropriate to acknowledge that role," Gibbs told reporters at his daily briefing.

The awful, dispicable UN does not one good thing, anywhere on Earth. The blue-hats are much more likely to be implicated raping children, stealing from people, and funneling money to brutal dictatorships than they are stopping violence. In fact, where there is violence and shooting, that's the place you can count on not finding any UN troops. But that's where you'll always find American troops doing the job the UN is supposed to be doing.

The American taxpayer is robbed year after year to pay for this collection of kooks and anti-American despots to hang around New York and criticize us. The more virulently anti-American you are, the more of a hero you will be to the UN audience. The more you oppress your people, the more you steal aid money, and the more corrupt your dictatorship, the more favorably the UN will gaze upon you.

Yet, in spite of the hostility toward the US among UN representatives, President Obama wants to loot the American taxpayer for still more cash to fork over to Ban Ki-Moon for the UN's pointless, idiotic adventures in child rape around the world.

Here's Ban Ki-Moon, puckering up to kiss some anti-American, dictator butt.

Don't mess with Israel

Somehow, I don't think this was an accident.....

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) - Israel shelled the United Nations headquarters in the Gaza Strip on Thursday, engulfing the compound and a warehouse in fire and destroying thousands of pounds of food and humanitarian supplies intended for Palestinian refugees.

If I was an IDF pilot with some extra ordinance on my plane and I saw the Gaza UN building down below in my sights, it'd be pickle-button all the way. Nobody has a longer record of anti-semitism than the loathsome, despicable UN. To drop a bomb on it would be almost irresistable.

The reprehensible United Nations

If you want to know just what a bunch of self-serving, corrupt elitists the U.N. reps are, look no further than this tidbit.....

The U.N. Human Rights Council, frequently accused of coddling some of the world's most repressive governments, threw itself a party in Geneva Tuesday that featured the unveiling of a $23 million mural paid for in part with foreign aid funds.

In a ceremony attended by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Spanish artist Miquel Barcelo told the press that his 16,000-square-foot ceiling artwork reminded him of "an image of the world dripping toward the sky" — but it reminded critics of money slipping out of relief coffers.

This crap is what the U.N. spends it's money on, money seized primarily from U.S. taxpayers. And The Obamessiah wants to triple our "contributions" to this America-hating, criminal organization. For what? So the U.N. blue-helmets can rape children in Africa, operate forced-prostitution rings in the third world, and run like cowards at the sight of any armed resistance?

$23million to splatter paint all over the ceiling......I'd do it for $23.

Goops of paint dripping from the ceiling.....money well spent while children starve to death by the thousands.

Cows....global warming culprits

The heinous collection of third-world despots and America-hating dictators called the UN, continues to cling to the preposterous notion that global warming exists, and that cows are contributory to it. Lectures the UN's global warming czar....

People should have one meat-free day a week if they want to make a personal and effective sacrifice that would help tackle climate change, the world's leading authority on global warming has told The Observer

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which last year earned a joint share of the Nobel Peace Prize, said that people should then go on to reduce their meat consumption even further.

Seems to me if cow farts contribute to global warming, we should be eating more cows to get rid of them. That said, go out and eat a big steak tonight and do your part to curb harmless green-house gases.

My wife and I dined on delicious prime rib Friday night, that we found on sale at our local Piggly-Wiggly. We couldn't eat it all and threw some away. Tonight, we'll heap extra servings of ground beef into our marinara....you know, just to do our part.

A good use for the otherwise worthless UN

Ban Ki-moon has an amazing grasp of the obvious....

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has urged nations to seize an "historic opportunity to revitalise agriculture" as a way of tackling the food crisis.

Mr Ban told a UN-sponsored summit in Rome that food production would have to rise by 50% by 2030 to meet demand.
Mr Ban said export restrictions and import tariffs ought to be minimised to alleviate the crisis.
The summit comes as food costs have reached a 30-year high in real terms, causing riots in several countries.

What a revelation! Produce more food, to alleviate the food crisis. I'm quite sure nobody's thought of that.

The world can produce plenty of food easily and cheaply. The problems are these: 1. protectionist countries like the US pay their farmers NOT to plant crops so that the prices of what they do grow remain high 2. at the behest of idiot environmentalists, politically correct legislators force the markets to pour 20% of our corn into our gas tanks in the form of ethanol 3. many would-be bread-basket countries like Zimbabwe and Venezuela are rife with corruption, lawlessness, and/or socialism, preventing them from meeting regional food demand.

You people sometimes criticize me for complaining about problems but not offering solutions. That's not true first of all but, I'll offer these simple solutions to help relieve the food crisis.....and to stifle your unbearable whining...

1. Let the American farmers do what they do best, grow more food than any country in the world, feed Americans first and export the rest to the highest bidder. Do not pay them NOT to plant their land.
2. Completely abandon this moronic insistence on biofuels. They are absurdly inefficient as fuels, costly, and undesirable in the marketplace. If biofuels were a good idea, people would demand them and the markets would provide them without government mandates. Putting our food into our gas tanks is the stupidest idea environmentalist have come up with....and that's a stupid bunch of idiots.
3. The UN should apply intense pressure on countries who could be growing plenty of food, but don't because of government corruption, violence, or whatever. For instance, Zimbabwe should be forced to return it's farms to the whites who used to manage them very successfully....so successfully in fact, that Zimbabwe used to export food because they had so much. Venezuela used to be a bread-basket country until Hugo Chavez nationalized many of the privately managed farms. Now there's no incentive, no profit motive to plant and grow crops, so nobody does and that creates shortages.
4. The UN should promise poor and/or developing countries not only aid handouts, but agri-training. Only those countries who can demonstrate their dedication to law and open markets will receive this traning and aid.
5. Wealthy nations could privide farm equipment, seeds, fertilizer, and expertise to nations that qualify for it. Rather than handing our tax dollars over to corrupt UN officials, use it to directly help development of agri-business in poor nations.

If the UN and the US did these obvious things, there would be no world hunger problem.

Hold on to your wallets

Like every thing else that's wrong in the world right now, it's popular to blame the imaginary phenomenon called global warming for exacerbating world hunger. As head kook of the abysmally corrupt United Nations, Ban Ki Moon explains....

ACCRA, Ghana (AP) - The U.N. chief warned Sunday that the world must urgently increase food production to ease skyrocketing prices and pledged to set up a task force on a crisis threatening to destabilize developing nations.
The cost of food has increased by around 40 percent since mid-2007 worldwide, and the strain has caused riots and protests in countries like Cameroon, Burkina Faso, Haiti and Egypt.

"We must make no mistake, the problem is big. If we offer the right aid, the solutions will come," Ban said at the opening of a a five-day U.N. conference on trade and development in Ghana's capital, Accra.

"One thing is certain, the world has consumed more than it has produced" over the last three years, he said.

Ban blamed a host of causes for the soaring cost of food, including rising oil prices, the fall of the U.S. dollar and natural disasters.

He said he would put together a special task force to help deal with the problem and called on the international community to help. He said the U.N. World Food Program plans to raise $750 million per year to help feed 73 million people in 80 countries.


The irony is that enviro-kooks' solution to their deranged hallucinations actually IS the cause of more hunger. As Al Gore and his lapdog worshippers absurdly insist that we fill our tanks with food rather than petroleum, the world prices of basic food stuffs rise rapidly, plunging already struggling countries further into misery and despair. The wild-eyed demand for bio-fuels not only increases the price of corn for ethanol, it also increases the prices of other staples because farmers are replanting fields with corn instead of less profitable rice, soybeans, you name it. But global-warming zealots in the US and abroad won't admit that bio-fuels are a complete and utter environmental and economic disaster, they just promise to demand more money from rich nations(the U.S.) to fix the problem of world-wide hunger. A problem that so far no amount of money has even put a dent in.

Actual causes of hunger in Africa:
Rampant governmental corruption, blood-thirsty dictators, tribal warfare, unchecked disease transmission, refusal to use birth control, white farmers killed or kicked off their formerly very productive farms. Do you see what all of those reasons have in common? They all require blame to be placed on Africans themselves. But for liberal boobs, that would be insensitive, so they just blame the easy target, global warming, which by extension is blaming the US.

A well fed Ban Ki Moon plots his next seizure of US wealth to throw down the rat's hole of African hunger.

Reader Mail

Alert reader freedom2learn, always on top of developing stories, wrote in with this question...What is Agenda 21 and how does it effect The Great Lakes?

First of all, I hope you didn't just eat because you'll need a barf-bag after you read Wikipedia's description of Agenda21....

Agenda 21 is a programme run by the United Nations (UN) related to sustainable development. It is a comprehensive blueprint of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organisations of the UN, governments, and major groups in every area in which humans impact on the environment. The number 21 refers to the 21st century.

The term sustainable development is UN code for the intent to seize the wealth and restrict the economic activity of wealthy nations, specifically the US. To the UN, it's not a fair world unless all nations are equal in misery, hunger, and despair, and it's using the global warming hoax as a pretext to controlling our economy, industry, and wealth.

Look no further than this quote from their web site to pretty much sum it up.....and to pretty much make you lose your lunch.

"...current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not sustainable. A shift is necessary. which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations..." [1] Maurice Strong , opening speech at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development

To answer freedom's question specifically about the Great Lakes region, here are the specific goals of Agenda 21...

Agenda 21 sets out environmental strategies for the management of coasts, oceans, and water, the monitoring and reduction of chemical waste, the eradication of radioactive waste, and the conservation of natural vegetation and soils. In addition, there are plans for the development of sustainable farming, and other socio-economic proposals which include measures to improve health care, to reduce poverty, and to develop fair and environmentally friendly trade policies.

The aim is to promote global sustainable development at a more fundamental level than traditional aid programmes, based on common needs and interests, and on collective responsibility.

"develop fair trade policies, common needs and interests, collective responsibility".

This reeks of socialist/marxist dogma, or exactly what you would expect from the most corrupt, detestable collection of thugs and dictators ever assembled. In short, because Canada stupidly signed Agenda21, the government can impose these restrictions on it's side of the Great Lakes without debate. Without a doubt, they will affect life in or around the US side too. In the US, thankfully, the President cannot enter into a binding international agreement unilaterally. Those have to be passed by Congress. Hopefully, our legislators will resist the pressure to submit to the UN's insidious plot to control us.

Go to Crossroad and see the reprehensible UN bureaucrats' ploy to seize control of your lives.

US Foreign Aid to hostile countries

Would somebody please explain what American taxpayers get for handing over their hard-earned treasure to countries who're provably hostile to our interests. This an exerpt from an article I found over at FortLiberty.org...

The United States gives out $13.3 billion tax dollars in direct Foreign Aid annually.
The United States is above and beyond the single most generous benefactor of the United Nations, donating $2.4 billion dollars of your hard earned money, to primarily third-world dictators.

This amount is 25% of the United Nations budget.

In addition, the United States gives another $1.4 billion tax dollars to United Nations' programs and agencies.
The American taxpayers fund more for the United Nations than ALL of the other 177 member nations combined.

What most Americans do not realize is that the vast majority of the recipients of the of US Foreign Aid routinely vote against the wishes of the United States in the United Nations at an average rate of 74%.
In other words, of the $13.3 billion tax dollars invested in direct Foreign Aid only about 26% or $3.5 billion went to support people who endorsed American initiatives or causes. A staggering $9.8 billion tax dollars went to causes and people who were and are in open and direct opposition to the United States' interests and objectives.

Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2 billion annually in US Foreign Aid.
Jordan votes 71% against the United States and yet still receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
Pakistan votes 75% against the United States and yet receives $6,721,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
India votes 81% against the United States and yet still receives $143,699,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

Perhaps it is time to get out of the UN or make some significant changes, and give the tax savings back to the American workers who are having to skimp and sacrifice to pay the taxes.

I'm not stupid. I realize that the idea is that if we shower these otherwise hostile countries with fabulous cash and prizes, maybe they'll be on our side if we need them in a crisis. I for one think this is money poorly spent. I think they gladly take our money and laugh at how stupidly gullible we are to think they are our friends now that we've "bought" their friendship.

Here's an idea to pay for the tax rebate we'll be getting in a few months. We should suspend for one year all foreign aid packages, then see who our friends are. I suspect the attitude of our enemies will change dramatically and they'll really be genuinely helpful when we need them to be.

Why are we paying countries to hate us? The UN needs to be moved to Europe and let them pay for it.

Al Gore, not terrorists, might be America's biggest enemy

The multinational crime syndicate known as the United Nations began plotting in Bali last week, to seize vast sums of wealth from US taxpayers. Of course Al Gore the glitterpig gladly damned the US for being the biggest contributor to the figment of his imagination we call global warming. Here's part of the article detailing the UN's plans to steal from US citizens...

Global Carbon Tax Urged at UN Climate Conference

BALI, Indonesia – A global tax on carbon dioxide emissions was urged to help save the Earth from catastrophic man-made global warming at the United Nations climate conference. A panel of UN participants on Thursday urged the adoption of a tax that would represent “a global burden sharing system, fair, with solidarity, and legally binding to all nations.”

“Finally someone will pay for these [climate related] costs,” Othmar Schwank, a global tax advocate, told Inhofe EPW Press Blog following the panel discussion titled “A Global CO2 Tax.” Schwank is a consultant with the Switzerland based Mauch Consulting firm

Schwank said at least “$10-$40 billion dollars per year” could be generated by the tax, and wealthy nations like the U.S. would bear the biggest burden based on the “polluters pay principle.”

The U.S. and other wealthy nations need to “contribute significantly more to this global fund,” Schwank explained. He also added, “It is very essential to tax coal.”

The UN was presented with a new report from the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment titled “Global Solidarity in Financing Adaptation.” The report stated there was an “urgent need” for a global tax in order for “damages [from climate change] to be kept from growing to truly catastrophic levels, especially in vulnerable countries of the developing world.”

The tens of billions of dollars per year generated by a global tax would “flow into a global Multilateral Adaptation Fund” to help nations cope with global warming, according to the report.


Show me in the Constitution where an international body comprised of thugs, dictators, and criminals can demand and receive access to US taxpayer money. Unless I'm mistaken, it would require a treaty, which would require approval of both houses of Congress...although a democrat in the White House would ferret out a way around the Constitution...it's what they try to do every day anyway.

Pay attention to this story folks. The UN and it's subversive liberal supporters among us like Al Gore, would love nothing more than to seize wealth from us taxpayers and distribute it to their despotic friends around the world.

Funny isn't is how Al Gore criticizes the US for being the biggest producer of CO2 in the world, but shrugs his shoulders when it's pointed out that we are also the biggest contributor to the world by far, of wealth, industrialization, medicine, transportation, agriculture, information, technology, economic/religious/political freedom, and charity, etc. The list goes on and on of the things we lead the world in. Of course we're rich. We deserve to be, and nobody has the right to steal it from us based on an idiotic, utopian, socialist fantasy of world equality disguised innocuously as a carbon tax.

UN hypocrites

Of all the places to host a conference on climate change, the UN stupidly chose the place as far from UN headquarters as they could get....the tropical island paradise of Bali. 10,000 people will attend the "conference"(I used quotes because the "conference" is really a tax-payer funded vacation for family and friends of UN reps). Unless you are completely devoid of humor, liberals-I'm talking to you, you can't have missed the irony of jetting half way around the world to gripe about CO2-induced global warming having just gushed millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere by flying there.

I was curious about the "carbon footprint" this UN jaunt would leave so I Googled it. What I found was this site run by Scott Kirwin called The Razor, in which he details the carbon footprint of the UN conference on global warming. It's pretty interesting, but the bottom line is that they presume to lecture us little people about driving SUV's and grilling burgers, but their flight to Bali left a footprint thousands of times bigger.

The real objective behind the global warming hoax

The slimey group of degenerates, thugs, and leeches collectively known as the United Nations is taking an all-expenses-paid luxury vacation to Bali to discuss, over fruity drinks with umbrellas, the wholly imaginary global-warming crisis. All flying in one big jet to reduce their carbon emissions I would guess.....well, guess again...

(11/3/2007) Tempo Interaktif reports that Angkasa Pura - the management of Bali's Ngurah Rai International Airport are concerned that the large number of additional private charter flights expected in Bali during the UN Conference on Climate Change (UNFCCC) December 3-15, 2007, will exceed the carrying capacity of apron areas. To meet the added demand for aircraft storage officials are allocating "parking space" at other airports in Indonesia.

The hypocrisy of UN bureaucrats, and American politicians, knows no bounds. I'm sure the Goreacle will be on hand to bless the proceedings by sprinkling holy water collected from melting glaciers or some such idiocy. I wonder how many American families could exist for a year, and still not equal the carbon footprint of one flight in a Leer jet to Bali?

Q: Why is the US taxpayer the primary funding source for this repulsive club for America-haters? Answer: Because breathless panic over climate change is only the red herring for what's really happening. By alarming everybody about phony climate change, politicians in the US of both parties, are counting on the stupid American populace to clamor for rescue and for our government to save us from the global warming boogey-man. They know that once we are sufficiently alarmed about the looming crisis, no matter how imaginary, we will submit to any curtailing of our activities because after-all, it's for the greater good. We'll allow our government to curtail our consumption of goods and food, our travel habits, our waste, our spending, where we can go on vacation, the list goes on and on of the facets of our lives our government desires to control. Politicians always want to control more and more of your lives. It's the source of the political power to which they are addicted.

And the bigger picture is that the UN wants to control our government, which is in control of us. The UN wants the US to cede control of the internet over to it. The UN wants to tax the US for having a carbon footprint that is too big. The UN wants to have control over the US military to use as it's private meals-on-wheels unit to send to anywhere in the world they wish....meals funded entirely by the US taxpayer of course. The UN wants to have observatory rights over our elections to make sure they are "fair"---translated, to make sure a good UN-loving liberal like Hillary is President. The UN wants the US to ask permission from it whenever we need to defend ourselves, either pre-emptively or reactionarily.

You see, this whole global warming nonsense isn't about saving the planet. It's about controlling the lives of the little people, specifically the lives of American little people. Heaven help us if Hillary gets voted queen of America.

The UN prepares to make a play for more US tax dollars

I'm growing a little tired of debating the whole man-made global warming charade, and up until now, the dreadful collection of despots, thugs, and criminals known as the United Nations has stayed safely at a distance. But that's all about to change, especially if Hillary gets elected queen. First, here are are a few paragraphs from a recent article reporting on the UN's latest declaration about the menace of global warming...

VALENCIA, Spain - The Earth is hurtling toward a warmer age at a quickening pace, a Nobel-winning U.N. scientific panel said in a landmark report Saturday, warning of inevitable human suffering and the threat of species extinction.

The report also offered blueprints to avert the worst catastrophes. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said climate change imperils "the most precious treasures of our planet."

The potential impact of global warming is "so severe and so sweeping that only urgent, global action will do," Ban told the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change after it issued its fourth and final report this year.

That's the usual meaningless diatribe we've come to expect from the useless UN, but here's the kicker...

The report does not commit participating governments to any course of action. But it is important because it is adopted by consensus, meaning those countries accept the underlying science and cannot disavow its conclusions. It provides a common scientific baseline for the political talks.

Translated, that means the UN will reserve the right to levy taxes on countries which do not meet the ridiculous emissions goals set forth by them. The UN thugs have always wanted a larger piece of the American economic pie and punitive emissions taxes to save the Earth from the imaginary menace of global warming is how they'll go about it. A conservative in the oval office will simply tell the UN where to stick their taxes, but a liberal democrat, i.e. Hillary, will subserviently bow to the UN demand because liberals place the financial gluttony of the UN before the economic welfare of the US. Liberals don't think it's fair that America is richer than other countries and would gladly "share" our wealth with poorer countries....as if tax-payers don't fork over hundreds of times more in aid than any other country on Earth already.

Just blow the whole thing up

So the motley collection of third-world thugs and dictators known as the United Nations has decided that their building is run-down, and they want 2billion dollars to fix it. Guess who'll they hit up first? That's right, the same people who've been underwriting their anti-American hatred and international uselessness....the American taxpayer.

Michael Adlerstein, the architect who oversees the Capitol Master Plan, says the building "cannot function much longer in its present state".

He also has another reason for hoisting the infrastructure into the modern world - it is currently vulnerable to explosives.

Despite the grand setting, many of the fittings are worse for wear
"There's a tremendous need to secure the building against terrorist acts," he told the BBC.

Now there's an idea whose time has come. Just blow the whole thing up and move the UN to Brussels or Stockholm or The Hague or somewhere else they're more welcome. But that won't happen because that would make it too difficult to plunder and pillage the American taxpayer for funds with which to criticize us subvert our activities. I fully expect Bush to pony up taxpayers' money for the renovations, especially now that he's been all snuggly with Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton about middle east peace...how embarrassing! And if he doesn't pay for it, Queen Hillary certainly will when she takes office.

U.N. idiocy

First, I'd like to thank David and Reid for brilliantly guest-blogging in my absence. Great job guys! Now on to liberal ridiculing...

Just when we got rid of Kofi Annan, the most corrupt UN leader in the sordid history of that embarassing collection of degenerates and despots, we get Ban Ki-moon, who turns out to be an global warming zealot...

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that the slaughter in Darfur was triggered by global climate change and that more such conflicts may be on the horizon, in an article published Saturday.
"The Darfur conflict began as an ecological crisis, arising at least in part from climate change," Ban said in a Washington Post opinion column.
UN statistics showed that rainfall declined some 40 percent over the past two decades, he said, as a rise in Indian Ocean temperatures disrupted monsoons.
"This suggests that the drying of sub-Saharan Africa derives, to some degree, from man-made global warming," the South Korean diplomat wrote

In case you haven't figured it out yet, global warming hysteria is a thin veil for an attempt to tax the great wealth of the U.S. The U.N. wants nothing more than to sink it's tentacles into the powerful U.S. economy. With the help of the useful idiots in the democratic party, the blame for anything bad that happens in the world will increasingly be blamed on imaginary global warming, and since the U.S. is the biggest producer of CO2, it will be taxed as a form of punishment...by whom else? Why the all powerful U.N. of course.

If you want to see money seized from the U.S. economy in the form of U.N. taxes, then vote for a democrat in '08.