Five year old cross-dresser makes a splash on Today Show

I'll probably get a lot of hate mail for this but on NBC this morning, Meredith Viera gleefully featured a 5 year old cross-dressing boy whose mom calls him "Princess Boy" because he loves to wear frilly girl clothes and prance around like a girl. Here's a snippet, but you can easily find the whole cringe-inducing interview elsewhere, that is if you can stomach it.....



The point of the show was so NBC could promote to its 6 viewers, the acceptance by society of little boys who like to dress up in girls' clothes and have a "masculinity expert" convince the audience that this behavior is totally normal. Next he'll be making the rounds of the afternoon talk shows, and finally 60minutes, after which, anybody who criticizes the parents will be branded an intolerant homophobe and a hater.

What happens when the kid goes to kindergarten? Will he want to use the girl's restroom? Will his parents demand he be given a gender-neutral restroom? When he plays sports, if he plays sports, will he insist on wearing a girl's uniform? Will the parents sue the school system when it informs them that he cannot wear dresses to school?

Look, I don't care if the kid turns out to be gay, a transvestite, or wants to have a common-law arrangement with a goat, two midgets, and a spaghetti colander. Those are adult decisions that should be made as an adult. As a parent you cannot indulge/encourage every crazy whim your five year-old has and rationalize it as "acceptance".

A tranny wants to play golf with the chicks

In California, a male-to-female transexual wants to join the LPGA. What could go wrong?

Lana Lawless, the 2008 Women's Long Drive Association (LDA) champion, claims in her lawsuit that her civil rights have been violated by the LPGA. The LPGA rules state that no one can play on tour unless she was born female.

The LPGA has rejected Lawless' applications to enter qualifying events. Lawless is legally female after undergoing a sex change operation.

I'm sorry but just because the kooky laws of your state give you permission to pretend and be recognized as a gender that you are not, it doesn't mean you are actually that gender. Miss Lawless still has a Y chromosome in every cell in "her" body, which makes "her" a man. Moreover, despite all the estrogen she's taken to make her appear more feminine, she's still got the strength of a man, which would make it unfair for her to compete on the LPGA.

Cookies or cupcakes?

Some dumb, gay students at Purdue got their feelings hurt because a bakery called Just Cookies refused to make them cupcakes.....idiots!

From FoxNation -- An Indianapolis bakery is facing a government investigation over allegations it refused to make rainbow-themed cupcakes for a gay student group.

Members of a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender group at Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis told WISH-TV that Just Cookies denied their request. The cupcakes were to be part of a celebration planned for next month’s National Coming Out Day.

But David Stockton, the owner of Just Cookies, said there was a problem — they don’t make cupcakes. However, there was also another issue.

“We are a family business,” owner David Stockton told WISH-TV. “I have some reservations about whether it should be celebrated. That is where I stand.”

I suspect there was an ulterior motive here on the part of the student org. to get some attention. That said, besides the fact that Just Cookies doesn't even make cupcakes, it's a private business and as such can refuse service to anybody it chooses. Of course it must also accept the market consequences of refusing service to a particular group, but that's how the free market works.

Personally, I think it's a stupid call to refuse to serve gays(gay money being just as green as breeder money) but the owners have a Constitutional right to do just that, without the federal government investigating them for hate crimes.

The real crime here is that supposedly intelligent Purdue students went to a bakery named Just Cookies and demanded cupcakes.....heh heh.

Asking for it

In case you aren't a sports fan, this is Ines Sainz, she covers the NFL and other sports for TV Asteca. Over the weekend she tweeted about how embarrassed she was when she was treated to cat calls and whistles from Jets players in the locker-room after a practice.

These are pictures of her at work, doing her job. Now, I'm not condoning sexual harassment and certainly if she felt threatened or was touched in any way, that qualifies as harassment and should not be tolerated but, COME ON!

You don't dress like a hooker and then expect to not draw some male attention. She's lucky all they did was whistle and make a couple of comments. A woman doesn't put her lady-parts on display and then complain when men react to it. I don't feel sorry for her one bit. I think she saw the attention that Erin Andrews got from being a victim and thought she could make a name for herself that way too. The difference is that Erin Andrews was actually the victim of a crime. Ines is the victim or beneficiary of her own bad fashion judgement, depending on how you look at it.

Here are some other pictures of her at work. It's inappropriate and unprofessional at least.

John Edwards sex tape.......gross!

You might want your office garbage can handy for this one....

Sources have told us that, in the throes of their affair, John Edwards and Rielle Hunter made a sex tape that contains "several sex acts."

Gross! Who wants to see Silky Pony having sex? It would be like watching two girls have sex, but then one turns out to be an effeminate, narcissistic dude. Yeah there are two Americas, and both are diving for their barf bags right about now.

New sex crime -- Public Butt-sniffing

I found this over at Belchspeak and couldn't resist swiping it for TRR. It's just too funny....



DUDE!!! Seriously!!!

Thanks Pat. I thought I had pretty much seen it all until I viewed this clip.

President Obama to children...if it feels good, do it!

This is Obama's degenerate Safe-Schools csar, Kevin Jennings. Over at Biggovernment, there's an article detailing his promotion of deviant, adult sexual practices to minors. Here's an excerpt if you have the stomach for it.....

[sic]....it was discovered that Kevin Jennings’ organization GLSEN sponsored a youth conference at Tuft’s University in March 2000. This conference was fully supported by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Safe Schools Program, the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and some of the presenters even received federal money. An undercover journalist with Mass Resistance was at the conference and recorded a couple of the workshops. During one of the conference workshops an activist asks 14 year-old students, “Spit or swallow?… Is it rude?”

That’s not all. The conference also included a workshop where GLSEN activists promoted “fisting” to 14 year olds

Of course don't expect to get this story from any of the networks and certainly not from MSNBC, where deplorable deviant Keith Olbermann and militant, aggressive lesbian Rachel Maddow will ignore it while making endless "tea-bagging" jokes about patriotic Americans. If you want to hear the clip, go here. And if you've heard Olby and Maddow laugh for minutes-on-end about tea-bagging and didn't get the joke, click on over to UrbanDictionary and see what they find so much fun to talk about on national TV.

To liberals, literally any behavior is OK for kids, especially if it involves sex, and intolerant conservatives shouldn't be such fuddy-duddy's about it. That's why Obama and the media don't see anything wrong with promoting hard-core sex to children.

I wonder if he'd let Sasha and Malia sit through a fisting workshop? Probably not but, he wants your kids to know about it.

Adam Lambert's on the fast-track to obscurity

Talentless, reality-show creation Adam Lambert shocked the TV audience with homo-erotic performance then, stupidly accused complainers of discrimination....

During the closing act, the openly gay singer simulated sex on stage with a back-up dancer and kissed a male musician on the mouth.

Lambert told US network CNN that the kiss was "in the moment".

ABC said the number of complaints was "moderate". The show's producers have declined to comment.

Lambert, who performed his debut single For Your Entertainment, said that if people had been upset by his performance that it is a "form of discrimination and it's too bad".

It's a little soon in Lambert's "career" to be resorting to hyper-sexual performances and accusing critics of discrimination. If he has any talent, which he might, it gets washed away with the in-your-face homosexuality of the performances. Say what you want about the sexual hypocrisy of Americans but, TV audiences are just not ready for the mainstreaming of prime-time, gay smooching and simulated oral sex. When you're already, in your first major performance, resorting to shock-value to get people to notice you, and then cry discrimination when people don't like it, I doubt you'll be very long-lived in the music industry....thankfully for the rest of us.

Even Meghan McCain can be right once in a while

Meghan McCain is way too moderate for me and her desire to remain part of the in-crowd in DC compels her to criticise the republican party a little too much and, in the same ways liberals do. That said, I sort of agree with her on D.A.D.T.....

Let me tell you a little something about what I know about Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: I have two brothers serving in the military and as far as I’m concerned, when an Arabic translator is kicked out of the military for being gay, it quite literally makes my brothers and our troops less safe. For me, Don't Ask, Don't Tell isn't just an equality issue. It is also a national-security issue.

This is the point we should be emphasizing for those who refuse to see Don’t Ask Don’t Tell opposition as a human-rights campaign. We need to bring the issue back to the security of our country both overseas and at home. Every soldier in our armed forces is serving his or her country in the most admirable way an American can, and we should be able to respect them, by not asking them to hide their sexual orientation.

I served in the Georgia Air Guard from 1980-1996 and I knew more than a few people who were either openly gay or closeted gays, and nobody really cared when it came down to doing our jobs. The only argument I can think of is the closeness of communal living you find in the military but, as far as I know, but for basic training, soldiers don't live intimately in big dorm rooms with dozens of other people.

Moreover, the national security issue is a big one. Why, if our biggest and only enemy right now are Arabic speakers, would we kick out of the military, trained, Arabic speakers, because of their orientation? It makes no sense to me....worse, it's self-defeating.

Finally, there are already rules prohibiting fraternization and public displays of affection that govern soldiers' behavior. Why aren't these rules adequate to cover any inappropriate activity, regardless of orientation?

If somebody has a convincing argument that demonstrates why gays cannot be good soldiers, I'd like to hear it.

The cowards at Playboy

Dr. Melissa Clouthier nails Playboy for pretending to do something controversial with this cover of a naked Virgin Mary, but really, how controversial is it? Making fun of Christianity is like taking candy from a baby. If Playboy wants to be cotnroversial and cutting-edge and sell lots of magazines, show a cover of a half naked Muslim girl. Somehow I don't think Hugh and Christy Hefner have the stones to take on throngs of outraged Muslims....they'd rather attack the easy, Catholic target that won't put a bounty on their head for doing so.

It sucks to be Larry Craig

Wouldn't you hate for your only legacy to be the dude who got busted soliciting anonymous sex from a cop in an airport bathroom stall?

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) - (AP)—Minn. court rejects Idaho Sen. Larry Craig's request to withdraw guilty plea in sex sting.

Dude, once you cop to solicitation, you can never take it back. Did he learn nothing from Bill Clinton? When you are caught red-handed in a moral transgression, deny, deny, deny, until there is overwhelming proof of your guilt. Then, and only then, do you offer a carefully parsed admission along with a heartfelt apology to those who you've hurt by your mistakes.

It's not pollution, it's science

I found this story over at BelchSpeak, from Ananova....

Villagers were shocked after a monkey-like piglet was born in China.

Curious locals flocked to the home of owner Feng Changlin after news of the piglet spread in Fengzhang village, Xiping township.

"It's hideous. No one will be willing to buy it, and it scares the family to even look at it!" Feng told Oriental Today.

He says the piglet looks just like a monkey, with two thin lips, a small nose and two big eyes. Its rear legs are also much longer than its forelegs, causing it to jump instead of walk.

Feng's wife said the monkey-faced piglet was one of five newborns of a sow which the family had raised for nine years.

"My God, it was so scary. I didn't known what it was. I was really frightened," she said.

"But our son likes to play with it, and he stopped us from getting rid of it. He even feeds it milk."

I was in the middle of eating lunch when I first saw this picture, and I swear, I almost tossed my left-over roast and potatos onto my keyboard. I literally gagged.

Don't tell me the Chinese aren't experimenting with chimeric species technology. But why a pig and a monkey? A cross between say....Madonna and a SlimJim meat snack would be much more interesting. My bad, they already did.......

Demi Moore, where have you gone?

Normally, I think the pregnant female body is attractive, I mean if the woman is attractive already. That said, I'm not sure what to make of this, I mean other than....eeeeeww!

These extraordinary new pictures show the world's first pregnant man—captured just four weeks from the birth of his baby girl.

First of all, this is not a dude. It is a chick who has been surgically modified to look like a dude. Regardless of her appearance, she still has two X chromosomes, a uterus, and ovaries, so it is not extraordinary for her to have gotten pregnant. That people want to see pictures of this freak-show of a couple....now that's extraordinary.

If you have eaten breakfast already and want to see all the pictures, click here and take a look.

Celebrity trainwreck alert

We haven't poked fun of an impending celebrity trainwreck in a while here at TRR...Britney, Lindsay, and Paris wrecked long ago and are just too easy. What we like is for fresh newcomers to take a header off the celebrity high-wire for our amusement. Now, hot on the heels of her nudie pics in Vanity Fair, 15 year old Miley Cyrus has been dating a 22 year old back-up dancer. I realize here in the South, there's practically no age of consent....witness the trollop Jamie Lynn of the Spears hillbilly clan. That said, a twenty-two year old dude dating a 15 year old girl is kind of creepy, even for the South.

When I was 11 or 12, we used to go skating at the roller-rink, and we used to see these twenty-something drop-outs hanging out in the parking lot smoking cigarettes and cruising for chicks, chicks that were like 14 or 15. That's what this reminds me of. I mean the creep factor is off the scale.

What possible interest could this grown man have in a 15 year old adolescent? Don't answer. It was a rhetorical question. We all know the answer. And where's her supposedly caring, involved dad Billy Ray? I mean besides at the bank cashing more of her checks? If I was her dad, I'd phone the authorities to inform them to bring an ambulance when they came to arrest me for beating the crap out of him.

All this talk of age appropriatness suggests a good topic for another installment of the TRR poll.....

If you had a 15 year old daughter, would you let her date a 22 year old man?
	Yes, if he promised me his intentions were honorable
	No, and the authorities have a word for this arrangement....pedophilia
	Who cares? Did you mention something in the post about nudie pics?
Free polls from Pollhost.com

What's bizarre is normal, and what's normal is bizarre

I blogged on the transgender issue a few months ago and got in big trouble with Jen Burleton over at Transfusion, a transgender advocate blog. Click on the link of you want to read what she told her readers about me and some of my regulars. Anyway, I found a post over at RightWingNews, about a bill making it's way through the Colorado legislature which would in effect make all public restrooms in that state open for anybody to use which ever one they wanted regardless of gender....

A new "transgender nondiscrimination" bill pending in Colorado, which would make it illegal to deny a person access to public accommodations including restrooms and locker rooms based on gender identity or the "perception" of gender identity, is one signature away from being law.

Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter, a Democrat, has one week to sign or veto Senate Bill 200, recently passed by both the House and the Senate. The bill, titled "Expanded Discrimination Prohibitions," holds this definition:

"'Sexual orientation' means a person's orientation toward heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, or transgender status or another person's perception thereof."

According to the bill, business owners and managers of restaurants, gyms, barber shops, massage parlors, etc., and managers of "public [facilities] of any kind whether indoor or outdoor" cannot deny a person employment or access to a facility based on gender identity or that "perception."

With all due respect and delicacy to Jen and the gals over at Transfusion........this is a load of crap! What do these gender-confused people think, that they live in Hedonism-III or somewhere? You can't just let everybody choose on the fly which bathroom they want to use each time they have to go....which is exactly how this'll turn out. It may not be the intent of the bill but that'll be the result. Remember, Lefties don't care about results, they define themselves by their intentions.

"But Ed", you'll whine, "normal people can use their assigned bathrooms just like always, but this allows people who don't know what gender they are, or who can't decide how they feel about their gender that day to chose which bathroom they'd like to use without anybody hasseling them about it."

Wrong! It allows anybody to use any bathroom they choose, whenever they choose. If there's a lock on the door and it's a single person room, I don't have a problem with coed bathrooms.....see, I'm not the prude you think I am. What about group showers at schools? Or large restrooms at ball parks, concert arenas, meeting halls, etc? Are guys, girls, and inbetweens going to be using the bathroom together....in front of each other? It's the whole "perception" word that makes it completely subjective as to which bathroom you choose that day.

The scary thing is that if the Obamamessiah gets elected President, and the House democrats gain a filibuster-proof majority, and the Senate democrats increase their majority, what's to stop the nutty liberals in Washington from passing all manner of kooky, politically correct laws that change the lives of all Americans? Good grief! High taxes will be the least of our worries.

Coming to your town more than likely.....if the Obamamessiah gets elected President.

A boy named Sue

The last time we had this discussion, it was about a 9year old in Colorado, now it's about a 9 year old in Phily...

For school officials in Haverford Township, the challenge was daunting: What do you do when a 9-year-old student, with the full support of his parents, decides that he is no longer a boy and instead is a girl?
Parents of a third-grade student at Chatham Park Elementary School approached the administration on April 16 to ask for help in making a "social transition" for their child.

The Haverford School District consulted experts on transgender children, then sent letters to parents advising them that the guidance counselor would meet with the school's 100 third-grade students to explain why their classmate would now wear girls' clothes and be called by a girl's name.

Look, I said it before and I'll say it again, indulging the orientation fantasies of a pre-pubescent child by letting him dress up like a girl and change his name is beyond child abuse. Why not wait until he's at least well into puberty before taking any of this seriously? Is it because his progressive hippie parents have him on a strict vegan diet? Is it because his touchy-feely parents made him play with dolls rather than trucks as a toddler to prove how non-gender biased they are? Or is it popular with the progressive in-crowd in Phily to screw up your kid by making gender-political statements through them?

Why not let the kid reach full-on puberty, say 16-17, and let him decide what makes him feel "normal". Then take medical action at that point if it's necessary. 9 year olds will eat bugs for money....you can't let them make complicated gender identity decisions for themselves at that age.

Quick, somebody get this kid a hamburger, a plastic gun, and some therapy.

When socialized medicine and Islam intersect

You know how I'm always ridiculing some of the practices of Islamic cultures abroad as backwards, third-world, and barbaric? Well guess what? I'm right!

Women are being given controversial "virginity repair" operations on the NHS, it emerged last night.
Taxpayers funded 24 hymen replacement operations between 2005 and 2006, official figures revealed.
And increasing numbers of women are paying up to £4,000 in private clinics for the procedure apparently under pressure from future spouses or in-laws who believe they should be virgins on their wedding night.
Doctors said most patients are immigrants or British of ethnic origin.

The trend has been condemned by critics as a sign of social regression driven by Islamic fundamentalists. Some countries have made hymen reconstruction operations illegal.

And just in case you think I'm unfairly impuning a culture not my own, out of xenophobia and ignorance, read this...

Dr Magdy Hend, consultant gynaecologist at the Regency Clinic, Harley Street, London, who started hymen reconstruction more than 18 years ago in the Middle East and the Gulf, said: "In some cultures they like to see that the women will bleed on the wedding night. If the wife or bride is not a virgin, it is a big shame on the family."

How absurd, stupid, and insecure are these Muslim men that they think hymen repair means their wives didn't have sex with people besides them already? And how barbaric to want to see the woman you love(and by "love" I mean "own") bleed in pain on your wedding night to prove she's a virgin? If your culture demands that you give your daughter's husband three pigs and a puka-shell necklace as a dowrey, fine. If your culture demands that you wear a bamboo pole on your penis as a sign of virility, fine. I can respect that, but even these primitive jungle tribesmen aren't deluded enough to think that hymen repair restores a woman's virginity.

The only funny thing about this story is that Great Britain's idiotic socialized medicine system is paying for it all. And in doing so, they're welcoming still more of the creeping infestation of radical Islamic culture into their own.

The Girl Next Door

Well the extremely rich girl from next door has finally done it and landed in jail. This young tart has managed to provoke even the most liberal set of judicial minds into putting her into her place. Paris has finally painted herself into a corner.
Lets examine her career path.

Since she is an heir to an extremely large financial war chest, and has been living on a trust since, well she probably has always lived from a trust. She probably has made her daddy really proud in the last few years. First there was Paris and Nicky frolicking all over the world. Then we have the proverbial "sex-tape" episode (don't you know her dad loved seeing her oral renderings on the Internet). What a tramp! Then she hooks up with this rich Greek guy named Paris and we are shown pictures of them wandering through life with drink in hand at all the greatest getaway spots. Lately, however, she has been on a real roll. Run-ins with the law, the no-panties freedom movement she founded with Britney, and now the heinous crime committed that landed her in jail. She can't drive or park a car. How simple is that. She gets to jail, pouts 'cause the food isn't from some trendy health food joint, and is let go. Unfortunately she can't stay away from trouble and is sent back kicking and screaming to serve her 45 day sentence in the pokey.

Put this spoiled little brat in the real population. Don't force other prisoners to re-bunk in order to make room for Paris-the video sex machine. (I'll bet there are some fun ideas roaming around the prison population right now.) Give her a taste of what her "Real Life" will be if she doesn't straighten up. She will, and will go back to the land of the Platinum-Spoon-in-Mouth Club, and live happily ever after - at least until her next raunchy video is released. Poor Paris- kinda feel sorry for her - don't cha.

STRAY-ROD !!

It appears that another sport celebrity has managed to screw-up (Pun possibly intended). Alex Rodriguez, the $252 million dollar man of the NY Yankees was caught on film entering his hotel with this blonde-non-wife female at midnight. A tryst in the making.

A-Rod checks into the Four Seasons hotel in Toronto on Sunday, the balance of the team is staying at the Hilton down the street, changes and heads to dinner with this girl and 2 friends. After dinner the party was shuttled to an upscale strip club in Toronto. Near midnight, these 2 are seen climbing into the "up" elevator. No mention of her departure time, if she has yet departed .

Facts as I know them are as follows:

A-Rod is married. Not to this woman. He is out of town. His wife is not with him. He is a rich and popular young man. He is not talking.

A-Rod is married and has a child by his wife. In their vows I assume he promised to honor her and to be faithful to her through sickness and health. It is apparent that at best something is amiss. I can only assume that most wives would not be thrilled to see a picture of their husband entering his hotel at midnight with another woman. By not talking, he only leaves available rampant speculation and gossip. What really bothers me, however, is the defense put on by Mike Golic this morning on his radio show. Mr. Golic is not bothered at all by any of the above mentioned issues. He is concerned with an invasion into the private life of a sports figure. I cannot fathom how a responsible adult could defend actions that violate a marriage and pawn it off on privacy issues. If the silence is lifted, I will gladly give Rodriguez a chance to explain, and will consider his explanation . I will not do the same for Golic. He apparently has no regard for the sanctity of marriage and for a promise/contract made and being fulfilled. I believe in fidelity to principle. Rodriguez is married and for better or worse should act as such.

Why stay at a seperate hotel? Why hang out with a

Are you As Smart as A 5th Grader?

Ladies and Gentlemen: To all readers of The Right Rant. I must again go on an all out moral tirade. I have sat by quietly and watched the developements unfold over the Warren Township sex scandal. I can no longer remain silent.

I am outraged at the school district's behavior over this incident. A simple recap for the uninformed out there. Two 6th graders engaged in sexual intercourse during class. The industrial arts teacher stated that this could not have been noticed, because both students were hunkered down under a cubicle in the classroom. The act was discovered after another student ( one of the trysting couples lookouts), was detained for a seperate offense , and this child tried to offset his punishment by passing info about the scenario.

Why did the superintendent try to cover this up? Why was the teacher not reprimanded? How can something like this go "unnoticed"? I am without answers. I am baffled to the cover up. I feel that the school board should have immediately dealt with all parties concerned and further informed the remaining students that this is not acceptable behavior, and is not tolerated - ever.

I am also distressed at the situation in general. 6th graders having sex- help, I am losing air here. These are 12 year olds, children, not even teens, yet. How can the community have missed the signals of this occurence? When did they become so lax that nothing matters?

I am posting this with 2 motives. First, those of us with children, should obviously review our own actions and thoughts, to make sure our kids do not get caught in the same trap. This must be stopped and it must be stopped now. I am concerned for diseases, maturity, ability to handle a situation, pregnancy, puberty, et al. Second, our future. Has the country fallen so far that this could be considered acceptable. If we carefully look at the Roman empire, there are many troubling similarities. Lets stop that trend, with the curtailing of this behavior. I welcome your comments and suggestions. I have sent a similar letter to the superintendent in my school district, and intend to take this up with a state representative that I know.