“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”

Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas


Thursday, May 22, 2014

Pat Sajak - thought criminal


Wheel host, Pat Sajak tweeted this a couple of days ago and now global warming lunatics want him fired for daring to deviate from climate-change orthodoxy.....

"I now believe global warming alarmists are unpatriotic racists knowingly misleading for their own ends. Good night.”


He's absolutely spot on here. Besides, when in America does voicing a political opinion equal hate-speech? As regular reader Bill noted to me the other day, global-warming alarmists are nothing more than socialists. Every malady that they imagine plagues the world has a Draconian, big-government remedy. I might add that they'd impose all manner of harsh remedies for the climate-change hoax onto the little people, but exempt themselves from the same. 


His "racist" charge might be because for every climate-change "remedy" there is a concomitant rise in energy prices to pay for it. This disproportionately harms poor people. But the CC lunatics don't care because they are children of wealthy parents and lead lives of idle leisure....a lifestyle that affords them the time to have dopey causes to fight for.  

6 comments:

David said...

I plan to watch "wheel" tonight in support. Now, can I buy a vowel please?

Anonymous said...

The Pope, the US Military, 97% of scientists, and most of the world know Pat is just wrong. And the "racist"/"unpatriotic" part of his statement boarders on insanity. To call his statement "voicing a political opinion" is just dishonest. There is no debate anymore - climate change is real and here now, due to our misuse of God's creation.

Shame on you for drinking the Kool-Aid instead of using your head.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

Ed said...

Shame on me? Shame on you for being an idiot, anon. The Pope? The US military? What qualifies them to judge what causes the weather?

As for the scientists, they have a personal financial interest in the global warming hoax, so they are discounted as well.

How do you account for the regular warming and cooling cycles the Earth has experienced for millions of years?

You're just a socialist who wants the government to control all aspects of human living, and that makes you a moron.

Bill said...

The exact comment anon wrote could have been written about Galileo's heresy.

Science is not settled by votes.

Www.judithcurry.com for some balance from a scientist.

Isaac A. Nussbaum said...

From http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/18300-climategate-3-0-university-threatens-blogger-for-exposing-97-consensus-fraud:

"Incredibly (but not so surprisingly, considering the fanaticism of some climate zealots), after deconstructing Cook’s data [referring to John Cook, the man who cooked up the 97.1% figure -IAN] that was publicly available, Shollenberger found that only 65 (yes, 65) of the 12,000+ scientific abstracts [.54% - IAN] Cook and his team of volunteers studied can be said to endorse the position that human activity is responsible for most of the experienced global warming.
For a 97.1-percent “consensus” we would expect 11,640+ abstracts to endorse anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming, or AGW — not a mere 65!"

slesed said...

b9x37d2v61 j6r33u5l05 j2a55p0v15 a5u54a8t85 m3q11m9p81 n7j41u4s37